Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Brown v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (DPSCS) et al
as 1:2017cv01212
Plaintiff:
Julian J. Brown
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (DPSCS), Maryland Division of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobey v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Service Division of Corrections-Maryland et al
as 8:2016cv03878
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S. Cobey
Defendant:
Oteyza, Tablow, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Corcoran et al
as 1:2016cv00306
Plaintiff:
Frankie L. McCoy, Sr.
Defendant:
Dayena M. Corcoran, O.I.C., M. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordineer v. Corcoran
as 1:2013cv02815
Plaintiff:
Danny Gordineer
Defendant:
Dayena M. Corcoran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Corcoran
as 1:2013cv02417
Plaintiff:
Michael Antonio Hardy
Defendant:
Dayena M. Corcoran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Corcoran et al
as 8:2011cv02690
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Blevins, Jr.
Respondent:
Dayena M. Corcoran and Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quickley v. Corcoran et al
as 1:2010cv02814
Petitioner:
Morris Quickley
Respondent:
Dayena M. Corcoran and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
D'Alessandro v. Foxwell et al
as 8:2010cv02560
Plaintiff:
Michael R. D'Alessandro
Defendant:
Ricky Foxwell, Dayena M. Corcoran, Laura Armstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2010cv01520
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Wendell M. France, Maryland Parole Commissions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Corcoran
as 8:2009cv03179
Plaintiff:
Duane T. Jones
Defendant:
Dayena M. Corcoran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
