Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Sullivan et al v. Alps Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03478
Defendant:
Alps Mechanical, Inc., Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary and others
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund and the International Masonry Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. Liberty Stone Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv03301
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Robert Ghiz, Hudson Insurance Company, International Fidelity Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sullivan et al v. Raza Contracting Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01882
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Corbex Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. M.A.C. Design Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv01846
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, M.A.C. Design Corp. and Ali Syed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. M.B. Din Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01734
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Mohammed Chatha, Dean Builders Group Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. Mastercraft Masonry I, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01041
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute, Pointers, Cleaners & Caulker, Welfare, Pension & Annuity Funds and others
Defendant:
John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, Mastercraft Masonry I, Inc. and Louis Tantillo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. Orba Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv06041
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, Rakesh Kumar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Bio-Medical Applications of Kentucky, Inc. et al v. Ovaco, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00883
Plaintiff:
Bio-Medical Applications of Kentucky, Inc. and BMA of Indiana, Inc.
Defendant:
Ovaco, Inc., Jeffrey Mackin, Michael Mackin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Sullivan et al v. Padilla Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03685
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, Padilla Construction Services, Inc. and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FIORE v. KOUNTZ & RIDER, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN et al
as 2:2013cv00476
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R. FIORE
Defendant:
KOUNTZ & RIDER, INC. MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN, KOUNTZ & RIDER, INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN, JOHN DOE, FIDUCIARY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
