Cases 21 - 30 of 1,599
McIntyre v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Defendant:
United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service doing business as IRS Agent John Does 1-100, Deputy Assistant Attorney General doing business as David A Hubbert and Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Revenue doing business as Shawn Jessy, DOR Agent
Plaintiff:
Joshua V. McIntyre
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Brown v. USA et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Defendant:
USA and John Does
Plaintiff:
Sandy Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ragouzis v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Edgar Thomas Ragouzis and Edgar T. Ragouzis
Defendant:
Richard O. Hamilton, Jr., ABC Legal Entities and John and Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00075
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00381
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 5:2024cv00172
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
