Cases 21 - 30 of 31
McCall v. Newton Correctional Facility
as 4:2010cv00377
Petitioner:
Dwight McCall
Respondent:
Newton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCall v. Newton Correctional Facility
as 4:2010cv00376
Petitioner:
Dwight McCall
Respondent:
Newton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Quaintance et al
as 4:2010cv00002
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Priscilla Rose Quaintance, Dwight David McQueen and State of Iowa, Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
McCall v. Unknown Defendants
as 1:2009cv00161
Plaintiff:
Dwight McCall
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timmons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2009cv00394
Plaintiff:
Dwight W Timmons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
More v. Keller
as 4:2009cv00258
Plaintiff:
Glendale More, Jr
Defendant:
Dwight Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danielson v. Keller
as 4:2009cv00086
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alan Danielson
Defendant:
Dwight Keller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schumacher v. Mahaska County Public Defender's Office et al
as 4:2007cv00514
Plaintiff:
Dwight Andrew Schumacher
Defendant:
Mahaska County Public Defender's Office, Mike Schakel and Rick Doty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schumacher v. Mahaska County Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2007cv00116
Plaintiff:
Dwight A Schumacher
Defendant:
Mahaska County Public Defenders Office, Mike Schakel and Rick Doty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Etter v. Sarasnat
as 4:2007cv00219
Plaintiff:
Caleb Dwight Etter
Defendant:
Sarasnat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
