Cases 21 - 30 of 135
Jones v. King et al
as 1:2013cv00511
Plaintiff:
La Tidtus Jones
Defendant:
Ron King , Theresa Seabrook , Hubert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding and Nigel McClain
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Powe et al
as 4:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
M. Powe, D. Huggins, H. Hollie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 4:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin, C. Dykes, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. Evans et al
as 4:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mosby
Defendant:
T. Evans, E. L. Sparkman, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 4:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin, C. Dykes, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Breakfield et al
as 4:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
J. Breakfield, F. Ovalle, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Magadaleno Medina
Defendant:
C. B. Epps, E. L. Sparkman, R. King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
