Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Amelyn Banares, et al v. Brian DeMore, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-55913
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMELYN G. BANARES and CARLOS M. SISON
Defendant - Appellee: BRIAN M. DEMORE, Acting Field Officer ICE, Los Angeles CA, JANE ARELLANO, Field Office Director, Los Angeles, CA, JONATHAN JOCK SCHARFEN, Acting Director, USCIS and others
Ronald Baugh v. USDC-ORP
as 09-71084
: In re: RONALD M. BAUGH
Petitioner: RONALD M. BAUGH
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Real Party In Interest: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINSTRATION and others
Mike Abghari, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 09-55450
Plaintiff - Appellant: MIKE ABGHARI and JALEH TADJDEH
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, DONALD NEUFELD, Director, Citizenship and Immigration Service, California Service Center and others
Zephyrinus Egbuonu v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 09-55230
Petitioner - Appellant: ZEPHYRINUS CHIEDU EGBUONU
Respondent - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, CHRISTINE DAVIS, District Director of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement of the Louisiana and others
National Lending Group, LLC, et al v. Eric H. Holder Jr., et al
as 09-15166
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIONAL LENDING GROUP, LLC, an Arizona limited liability corporation and MILLENNIUM BANC, LTD
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and EDWARD D. SAAVEDRA, Jr., Acting Director of Industry Operations, Phoenix Field Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives
Ronald Baugh v. Alberto Gonzales, et al
as 09-35007
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD M. BAUGH
Defendant - Appellee: ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States of America, in his individual capacity and official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Delmis Guzman-Fuentes v. Peter Keisler, et al
as 08-35737
Petitioner - Appellant: DELMIS GUZMAN-FUENTES
Respondent: PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, GEORGE MOLINAR, Chief of Detention and Removal Operations for the San Pedro Detention Facility and ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States
Veterans for Common Sense, et al v. James Peake, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-16728
Plaintiff - Appellant: VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE, a District of Columbia nonprofit organization and VETERANS UNITED FOR TRUTH, INC., a California nonprofit organization, representing their members and a class of all veterans similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES B. PEAKE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, JAMES P. TERRY, Chairman, Board of Veterans Appeals and others
Amicus Curiae: SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES, VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC., MILITARY SPOUSES FOR CHANGE and others
Vladimir Arutyunov v. Eric H. Holder Jr., et al
as 08-35455
Plaintiff - Appellee: VLADIMIR ARUTYUNOV
Defendant - Appellant: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Mercedes Lopez-Pineda v. A. Clark, et al
as 08-35236
Petitioner - Appellant: MERCEDEZ LOPEZ PINEDA
Respondent - Appellee: A. NEIL CLARK, Officer in Charge, Detention and Removal Operations, Northwest Detention Center, GEORGE C. WIGEN, Contract Facility Administrator, Northwest Detention Center, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of Homeland Security and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?