Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Knox v. Sockey et al
as 6:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
W.A. Sockey, Amanda Workman, Vickie Harless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Oubedda et al v. Napolitano et al
as 5:2009cv00595
Plaintiff:
Tarik Oubedda and Amber Hester
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Michael Aytes, Lisa Kehl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Singh v. Glanz et al
as 4:2009cv00186
Petitioner:
Sukhpal Singh
Respondent:
Stanley Glanz, Nuria T Prendes, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Khakhn v. Stewart et al
as 4:2009cv00097
Petitioner:
Lakhvir Gurpal Khakhn
Respondent:
Don Stewart, Nuria T Prendes, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
