Cases 21 - 30 of 32
WILLIAMS et al v. CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH et al
as 5:2014cv00345
Defendant:
PANAMA CITY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH, C JORDAN and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL EUGENE WILLIAMS and HAILE ANTOINETTE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. USA
as 8:2014cv01191
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00562
Petitioner:
Carl Eugene Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAMPSON et al v. CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS et al
as 1:2013cv24312
Plaintiff:
EARL SAMPSON , TOREE M DANIELS , ANTHONY LOWERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS , OLIVER G GILBERT, III , SHIRLEY GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Astrue
as 9:2012cv80747
Plaintiff:
Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Williams v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00638
Petitioner:
Carl Eugene Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. MCNEIL
as 5:2011cv00037
Petitioner:
TAVARES EUGENE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2011cv00022
Petitioner:
TAVARES EUGENE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. MCNEIL
as 5:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Tavares Eugene Williams
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv20357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
