Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Sherrill et al v. Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore et al
as 1:2013cv02768
Plaintiff:
Ruth Sherrill , Elizabeth Arnold , Merab Rice and others
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore , City of Baltimore Development Corporation , CBAC Gaming, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Edmonds v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv02191
Petitioner:
Keith Edmonds
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmonds v. Shearin et al
as 1:2013cv01547
Petitioner:
Keith Edmonds
Respondent:
Bobby Shearin, Sandy Cole and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Shearin et al
as 1:2012cv03114
Petitioner:
Darryl Edmond Green
Respondent:
Bobby Shearin and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmonds v. Morgan et al
as 8:2012cv02049
Petitioner:
Brad K. Edmonds
Respondent:
J. Philip Morgan and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOAO Control and Monitoring Systems, LLC v. ACTI Corporation, Inc.
as 8:2012cv00701
Movant:
Edmond Chin-Ping Chang
Plaintiff:
JOAO Control and Monitoring Systems, LLC
Defendant:
ACTI Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Scott v. Clark et al
as 8:2011cv02864
Plaintiff:
Edmond Scott
Defendant:
M. Clark, G. Whittington, Almiroudis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds v. Eli Lilly & Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02523
Plaintiff:
Janet Edmonds
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Inc. and Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fox et al v. Power
as 1:2011cv01685
Plaintiff:
Dewayne A Fox and Celia Shelton
Defendant:
Edmond J Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fox et al v. Power
as 8:2011cv01685
Plaintiff:
Dewayne A Fox and Celia Shelton
Defendant:
Edmond J Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
