Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Eldridge v. Haysi Regional Jail et al
as 7:2019cv00012
Plaintiff:
Travis Morley Eldridge
Defendant:
Haysi Regional Jail, Dr. Bruce Stevenson, NP April Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Cambridge Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Joann Murray
Defendant:
Cambridge Holdings LLC, Randy S. Jaegle and Benjamin R. Eldridge, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company v. Eldridge et al
as 1:2016cv01513
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
Defendant:
David F. Eldridge, Jr., David F. Eldridge, III and Aidan Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Thornton v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Eldridge Palmore Thornton
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Powell et al
as 1:2012cv00483
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Darlene Nelson Powell and Robert Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Eldridge v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00017
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Nannette D.W. Eldridge
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Saunders v. Salem Veterans Administration Medical Center et al
as 7:2010cv00183
Defendant:
Dr. Mary Camden, Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital, Dr. Thomas Eldridge and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Marie Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Collins v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
Nancy Eldridge Collins
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harris v. B.O.P.Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2007cv00363
Plaintiff:
Howard Mack Harris
Defendant:
B.O.P.Bureau of Prisons, D.O.J. Department of Justice, B.A. Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
