Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
R.J. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03285
Plaintiff:
R.J. , DANIELLE BROWN , D.R.M. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER INC. and GREENSTONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTRADA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv07308
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOSE ESTRADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Estrada-Medina v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv01558
Plaintiff:
Edgar Estrada-Medina
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ESTRADA v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2013cv03106
Petitioner:
RAMON LUIS SEDA ESTRADA
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF RISA VETRI FERMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEH STATE OF THOMAS M. CORBETT, JR.
Trustee:
THOMAS M. DELRICCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ESTRADA v. MAGUIRE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.
as 2:2012cv00604
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ESTRADA
Defendant:
MAGUIRE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ESTRADA v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58670
Plaintiff:
RAMON R ESTRADA
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ESTRADA et al v. ACANDS, INCORPORATED
as 2:2011cv53885
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO A. ESTRADA , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
ACANDS, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ESTRADA v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv53884
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO A. ESTRADA
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
