Cases 21 - 30 of 136
PHELPS v. WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
ROGER PHELPS
Defendant:
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. and KEVIN CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hutchings v. Diaz et al
as 2:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Samantha Hutchings
Defendant:
Daniel Diaz and Averitt Express, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Pete Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
FOREMAN v. MAJDANAC et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
DONETTA FOREMAN
Defendant:
FIKRET MAJDANAC and MIDWEST FREIGHT EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Page v. Allamy et al
as 2:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
Victor Page
Defendant:
Thorcam Allamy and A.D. Transport Express, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Galen A Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMAGE v. AMERIFREIGHT SYSTEM, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00293
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ramage
Defendant:
Amerifreight Systems, LLC, ValTrans Express, Inc. and Daniel Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOLGAMOTT v. CONTINENTAL EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00933
Plaintiff:
ANGELA WOLGAMOTT, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF KEVIN RAY BROWNING, DECEASED and ANGELA WOLGAMOTT
Defendant:
CONTINENTAL EXPRESS, INC. and ERIC MILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMPSON v. APEX EXPRESS, INC.
as 1:2021cv00744
Plaintiff:
Robert Simpson
Defendant:
Apex Express, Inc. d/b/a Cordell Transportation Company, LLC and APEX EXPRESS, INC. doing business as CORDELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
KIRK v. VOYAGER EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03066
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH KIRK
Defendant:
VOYAGER EXPRESS, INC. and GREGORY TYSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
