Cases 21 - 30 of 199
ROJAS v. FBOP et al
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
EDGAR ROJAS
Defendant:
FBOP, FCI FORT DIX WARDEN and DHS DEPARMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENDOZA v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv23215
Petitioner:
ALBERTO MENDOZA
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ulloa v. Warden of FCI-Fort Dix
as 1:2023cv23018
Petitioner:
Alex Ulloa
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. DIRECTOR et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JUSTO v. Warden FCI Fort Dix
as 2:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
STEVEN JUSTO
Defendant:
Warden FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ZAMUDIO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv22602
Petitioner:
REYNALDO PEREZ ZAMUDIO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMIREZ-SUAREZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv23104
Petitioner:
JUAN MANUEL RAMIREZ-SUAREZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FIORITO v. WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv23342
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FIORITO
Defendant:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ulloa v. Warden of FCI-Fort Dix
as 3:2023cv01986
Petitioner:
Alex Ulloa
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SOTO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv22945
Petitioner:
MANUEL ANTONIO SOTO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
