Cases 21 - 30 of 273
Shetiwy v. Midland Credit Management
as 16-2893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Amal Shetiwy, and other similarly situated, Louis C. Yeostros, and other similarly situated, John Murphy, and other similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Midland Credit Management, AKA Midland Funding LLC, Calvary Portfolio Services LLC., DebtOne, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Swift v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv01539
Defendant:
NB Holdings Corporation, Bank of America Corporation and FIA Card Services, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Richard Swift
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Gustavia Home, LLC v. Palaguachi et al
as 1:2016cv03898
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, City of New York Environmental Control Board, Criminal Court of City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Gustavia Home, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01299
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
