Cases 21 - 30 of 35
King v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2012cv00277
Plaintiff:
Frank King, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
In Re: United States of America v. Barrett
as 2:2012mc00069
Petitioner:
Frank Barrett
Respondent:
United States of America
Costello et al v. Home Depot, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
James D. Costello , Liza Logan , Matthew Picco and others
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Mark VII Car Wash Equipment of New England, LLC, et al
as 5:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
Mark VII Car Wash Equipment of New England, LLC, Peter Kelley and Frank DiTomasso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Coniff et al v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2010cv00032
Plaintiff:
Neil W. Aguiar, Kathy M. Blanchard, Thomas R. Burke and others
Defendant:
Jeb Spaulding, Neale Lunderville, State of Vermont and others
Not Classified By Court:
ENE Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Cimler v. H.J. Heinz Company
as 5:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Cimler, Jr.
Defendant:
H.J. Heinz Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Towsley v. Frank
as 2:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Roy Towsley
Defendant:
William Frank
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Towsley v. Frank
as 5:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Roy Towsley
Defendant:
William Frank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 2:2008mc00069
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Petters Company Inc., PCI, Petters Group Worldwide, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
