Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MANNING et al v. SECURIAN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv04717
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF RICHARD A. MANNING and LINDSEY MANNING
Defendant:
MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and SECURIAN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cunningham v. Foresters Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Foresters Financial Services, Inc., Octavia Pugh, Fosters Financial holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
United States of America v. Leach et al
as 3:2016cv00887
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Larry J Leach, Sarah A Leach, Graber's Well Drilling, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
