Cases 21 - 30 of 212
Banks v. Fitzgerald et al
as 1:2020cv00501
Respondent:
Rich Fitzgerald, Orlando Harper, United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Turkey et al
as 1:2020cv00441
Respondent:
Orlando Harper, Syria, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv00091
Respondent:
MARVIN MILLER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NOREEN A. RE and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv01685
Respondent:
CONNIE CLARK, ORLANDO HARPEN, DENNIS WALKER and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv02226
Respondent:
Connie Clark, Orlando Harpen, Dennis Walker and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv01428
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2019cv01354
Respondent:
USA, ORLANDO HARPER, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BANKS v. TUNEBERG et al
as 2:2019cv01269
Respondent:
KENDRICK LAMAR, KIMBA, CIA and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv01244
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHAL, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Tuneberg et al
as 1:2019cv01678
Respondent:
Kendrick Lamar, Kimba, CIA and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
