Cases 21 - 30 of 496
Nutter v. Wyatt
as 4:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Clifford Gregory Nutter
Defendant:
Lt James Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummond v. Kizziah
as 6:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Keith Drummond
Defendant:
Gregory Kizziah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
B.W. v. Kemp et al
as 5:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
B.W.
Defendant:
Gregory Kemp and Taylor Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Baker et al v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Eugene Baker, Lester Baker, Patricia Baker and others
Defendant:
Blackhawk Mining, LLC and Pine Branch Mining, LLC
Executor:
Shannon Vaughn White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Johnson v. Logan County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Earl K. Johnson
Defendant:
Logan County Jail, Phil Gregory, Gary D. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Rose
as 7:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Jay Gregory Mathis
Respondent:
Gary Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cecil v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Cecil
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hedges v. United States Marshals Service
as 5:2022cv00294
Petitioner:
Gregory Hedges
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Gary Martin and Phil Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
Jay Gregory Mathis
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
