Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Billingsly v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated et al
as 2:2008cv10667
Plaintiff:
Anthony Billingsly
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated and Top Hat Transportation, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Weeks v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated
as 2:2007cv15198
Plaintiff:
James Weeks
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Smith v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated
as 2:2007cv15197
Plaintiff:
Clifton Smith
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-2512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cooney v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated
as 2:2007cv14962
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cooney
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Thompson v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated
as 2:2007cv13522
Plaintiff:
Robin Thompson
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jefferson v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated
as 2:2007cv13486
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jefferson
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Gorman v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated
as 4:2007cv12911
Plaintiff:
Glenwood Gorman and Glenwood Gorman
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Nickels v. Grand Trunk Western, et al
as 07-1736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY R. NICKELS
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD INCORPORATED and CANADIAN NATIONAL/ILLINOIS CENTRAL
United Transportation Union v. Canadian National Railway Company et al
as 2:2007cv11815
Defendant:
Canadian National Railway Company and Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
