Cases 21 - 30 of 105
SCHATZ et al v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
as 2:2016cv01824
Plaintiff:
EDGAR SCHATZ and KAU KAN
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABDEL-AZIZ v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06783
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA ABDEL-AZIZ
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and MICHAEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ULMAN v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05838
Plaintiff:
AMALIA ULMAN
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. , SABRINA ANDERSON , FIRSTGROUP AMERICA and others
Counter_claimant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and SABRINA ANDERSON
Counter_defendant:
C.A.V. ENTERPRISE, LLC, AKOS GUBICA and HI-TECH RESOURCE RECOVERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04461
Plaintiff:
RITA JACKSON
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and RODERICK GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. v. CAV ENTERPRISE, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Defendant:
CAV ENTERPRISE, LLC , AKOS GUBICA and KAROLLY GUBICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
GEBRESELASSIE v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2014cv05705
Plaintiff:
NIGEST GEBRESELASSIE
Defendant:
RAY LEWIS , GREYHOUND LINES, INC. , GREYHOUND BUS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05290
Plaintiff:
RITA JACKSON
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. , 1001-1005 WEST FILBERT ST., LLC and RODERICK GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERRY v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
as 2:2014cv05191
Plaintiff:
DESIREE PERRY
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
as 2:2014cv04522
Plaintiff:
ELLIS HILL
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
