Cases 21 - 30 of 224
NORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05876
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN NORRIS, JOHN RUMPLE, QUASHAWN CYPRESS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grimes v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 6:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
Dontavis Olajuwon Grimes
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Gunther et al
as 5:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jeffery J. Grimes
Defendant:
Warden Gunther, Assistant Warden Brown, FNU Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moccia v. Town of Bay Harbor Islands et al
as 1:2023cv20006
Plaintiff:
Luigi Moccia
Defendant:
Town of Bay Harbor Islands, John Grimes, Ray Watler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
GRIMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04333
Plaintiff:
ROGER GRIMES, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRIMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02398
Plaintiff:
KRISTIAN GRIMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRIMES v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01143
Plaintiff:
ANDREW C GRIMES and ANDREW C GRIMES, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRIMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE A GRIMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell-Ware et al v. Bryant-Groover et al
as 8:2022cv02487
Defendant:
Angelina Colonneso, Shirley Bryant-Groover, Mark Barnebey and others
Plaintiff:
Christel Ware-Martin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GRIMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20007
Plaintiff:
DUANE GRIMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
