Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Raniero v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00230
Plaintiff: Louis Raniero
Defendant: UPS Ground Freight, Inc. and Riyadh Adbulhaleem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gittens v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00218
Plaintiff: Quentin T. Gittens
Defendant: Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Watson v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00464
Plaintiff: Jason Watson
Defendant: UPS Ground Freight, Inc. and Jerry A. McKinley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00458
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rhema et al v. UPS Ground Freight Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00252
Plaintiff: Dan Rhema and Susan Rhema
Defendant: UPS Ground Freight, Inc. , Penske Truck Leasing Corp. , Brown Packing Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hughes et al v. Blalock et al
as 3:2011cv00066
Plaintiff: Larry Hughes and Verna Hughes
Defendant: Lynda Blalock and Ceva Grounds US, L.P./Ashton Leasing LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Horn v. Schiller Grounds Care, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv00161
Plaintiff: Harold Greg Horn
Defendant: Schiller Grounds Care, Inc. , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mafcote Industries, Inc. v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00863
Plaintiff: Mafcote Industries, Inc.
Defendant: UPS Ground Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Type: Contract None
2815 Grand Realty Corp. et al v. Goose Creek Energy, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2008cv00186
Plaintiff: 2815 Grand Realty Corp., 2815 Grand Realty Corp., Wiltshire Realty Corp. and others
Defendant: Goose Creek Energy, Inc., Goose Creek Energy Holdings, Inc., Uriah Bement Coal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?