Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Lawrence et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv03123
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Lawrence , Daniel L. Lawrence , Suzanne L. Harmon and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harmon v. Davol, Inc. et alDO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv00842
Plaintiff:
Cody Bill Harmon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Abrotsky et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv02577
Plaintiff:
Melvin Abrotsky, Melvin Abrotsky, Melvin Abrotsky and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Harmon et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2008cv06542
Plaintiff:
Reggie Dewayne Harmon, Reggie Dewayne Harmon, Jaakkola Harmon and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Harmon et al v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company et al
as 0:2008cv00048
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harmon, Kevin Harmon, Kevin Harmon and others
Defendant:
Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Defoe v. Lindell et al
as 0:2007cv01597
Plaintiff:
Ohohshecha Defoe
Defendant:
Greg Lindell, Lynn Dingle, Shannon Reimann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfaro et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 0:2007cv00090
Plaintiff:
Amelia M. Alfaro, Amelia M. Alfaro, Amelia M. Alfaro and others
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
