Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Betancourt v. Ada County et al
as 1:2011cv00534
Plaintiff:
Aniceto Betancourt, IV
Defendant:
Ada County, Canyon County, Idaho State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Monson v. Corizon et al
as 1:2011cv00468
Plaintiff:
Timm Lewis Monson
Defendant:
Corizon, Scott Lossmann, Cynthia Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Corizon et al
as 1:2011cv00402
Defendant:
Corizon, Jan Epp, April Dawson and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Conway Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cutler v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
Mark Cutler
Defendant:
J Smith, Hey, Peneku and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betancourt v. Ada County et al
as 1:2010cv00430
Plaintiff:
Aniceto Betancourt, IV
Defendant:
Ada County, Ada County Clerks, Ada County Court Assistance Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Schwartz et al v. Adams County et al
as 1:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
Troy Schwartz, Troy Schwartz and Alvin Yantis
Defendant:
Adams County, William P Brown, Josph F Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dopp v. Craven et al
as 1:2007cv00512
Plaintiff:
Sidney David Dopp
Defendant:
Olivia Craven, Russ Newcomb, Del Ray Holm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2007cv00421
Plaintiff:
John W Holmes and Julie Ann Holmes
Defendant:
United States of America and Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Hahaj v. IDOC et al
as 1:2007cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jim Mitchell Hahaj
Defendant:
IDOC, Jeff Zmuda, Dawn Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoots v. Craven et al
as 1:2007cv00048
Plaintiff:
David William Hoots
Defendant:
Olivia Craven, Robin Sandy, Bud Brinegar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
