Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Humphries v. All-in-One Solutions Enterprise Inc.
as 4:2015cv00548
Defendant:
All-in-One Solutions Enterprises Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Humphries
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Humphries v. Pamerleau
as 5:2015cv00146
Petitioner:
Gary Stephen Humphries
Respondent:
Susan Pamerleau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phillips v. D.A. Humphries and Associates, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Harold Phillips
Defendant:
D.A. Humphries and Associates, LLC and National Credit Adjusters, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Humphries v. Pamerleau
as 5:2014cv01074
Petitioner:
Gary Stephen Humphries
Respondent:
Susan Pamerleau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Humphries v. Imagine Print Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv03594
Plaintiff:
Dennis Humphries
Defendant:
Imagine Print Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Humphries et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01588
Plaintiff:
Keith Humphries and Lynn Humphries
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Thomas P Schmalzried, MD
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Humphries, Jr v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv00745
Petitioner:
H L Humphries, Jr
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campa v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00696
Plaintiff:
David C. Campa
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association , Cecil Kester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Humphries v. Highline Technical Innovations Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02615
Plaintiff:
Steven E Humphries
Defendant:
Highline Technical Innovations Inc , Highline Hydrogen Hybrid Inc , Hoss Motor Sports Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
