Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Royal v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02248
Plaintiff:
Iris Royal
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Payne v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01113
Plaintiff:
Iris A. Payne
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OurPet's Company v. IRIS USA, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01642
Plaintiff:
OurPet's Company
Defendant:
IRIS USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Transky et al v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission et al
as 1:2013cv02639
Plaintiff:
Gregg Transky and Sondra Borrie
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission , Ohio Attorney General , Delores Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00602
Plaintiff:
Iris Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Kritinar et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22820
Plaintiff:
Iris Kritinar and Jerry Kritinar
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cousey v. Superior Forge & Steel Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv02112
Plaintiff:
Iris Cousey
Defendant:
Superior Forge & Steel Corporation and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rolfe v. AT&T - Repair Attendance Manager
as 1:2012cv01856
Plaintiff:
Iris L. Rolfe
Defendant:
AT&T - Repair Attendance Manager
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Mease v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21214
Plaintiff:
Iris Sylvia Mease
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
