Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Howell v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 1:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Samuel Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hansen et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2018cv00896
Petitioner:
Tamra I. Hansen and Cody J. Hansen
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Johnson v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, US Department of Justice and David Nuffer
Plaintiff:
Neldon Paul Johnson
Not Yet Classified:
Wayne Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2018cv00062
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, US Department of Justice and David Nuffer
Plaintiff:
Neldon Paul Johnson
Not Yet Classified:
Wayne Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Gibbs v. USA et al
as 2:2018cv00539
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Amber M. Smith, Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff:
William C. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6330
Wilson v. Chickering et al
as 2:2017cv01297
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Wilson
Defendant:
Sally A. Chickering, Ronie Wottineiz, Carl R. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USA et al
as 2:2016cv01250
Petitioner:
Curtis Jones
Respondent:
USA, Commissioner of Internal Revenue and Cody T. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Ku et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2016cv01147
Plaintiff:
Wenwei Ku and Ling Tang
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Shields v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2016cv00554
Plaintiff:
Karen Shields
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 2:2015cv00739
Plaintiff:
Shung H. Chan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
