Cases 21 - 30 of 75
STANLEY v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
DARNELL STANLEY
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, LYNNE E. JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROOKS v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
MELVIN D. BROOKS
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., THOMAS N. FAUST, G. FUTCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BROOKS v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
MELVIN D. BROOKS
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., THOMAS N. FAUST, GREGORY FUTCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMSEY v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2012cv01910
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD RAMSEY
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. , THOMAS N. FAUST and US PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STODDARD v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2012cv00857
Plaintiff:
KEITH STODDARD
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., DAVID WYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00607
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. ANDERSON
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JR., BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MONROE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv00558
Petitioner:
SYLVESTER L. MONROE
Respondent:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and ISAAC FULWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00546
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2012cv00509
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL A. STEWART
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
