Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
SMITH v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00594
Plaintiff: ANGELA J. SMITH
Defendant: CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. and UNITY HEALTHCARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MYERS v. BYRD et al
as 1:2008cv01793
Plaintiff: GLORIA MYERS
Defendant: RODNEY BYRD, IRVING MILLARD, DERON MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. SMITH
as 1:2008cv01640
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: THOMAS J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Other Statutes None
BAILEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2008cv00754
Plaintiff: COURTNEY ANTHONY BAILEY
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THOMAS WINKFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. SMITH
as 1:2007mc00314
Petitioner: KENNETH WILLIAMS
Respondent: WILLIAM J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. SMYTH et al
as 1:2007cv01090
Plaintiff: THERESA SMALL SMITH
Defendant: ANN SMYTH, EDITH H. SMYTHE, KAREN SMYTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. SMITH
as 1:2007cv00149
Petitioner: JULIUS MILLER
Respondent: WILLIAM J. SMITH and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
UNITED GOV SEC/INTL v. US MARSHAL SERVICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2002cv01484
Plaintiff: UNITED GOVERNMENT SECURITY OFFICERS OF AMERICA INTERNATIONAL UNION , ANN J. BARKLEY , WILLIAM J. BURGE and others
Defendant: AKAL SECURITY, INC. and ARES GROUP INCORPORATED
Counter_claimant: AKAL SECURITY, INC. and ARES GROUP INCORPORATED
Counter_defendant: HARLEN D. COY , DON E. KEMP , KEITH MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?