Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Darryl Wakefield v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-15885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL KENT WAKEFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, M. CATE, K. HURDLE and others
James Tierce v. J Tilton et al
as 5:2009cv00796
Plaintiff:
James Tierce
Defendant:
J Tilton, State of California Department of Corrections, Haggans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eichler v. Tilton et al
as 2:2009cv01032
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Eichler
Defendant:
J. Tilton, Woodford, Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert Smith v. Anti, et al
as 09-15092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT G. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTI, Captain, CDCR, J. TILTON, GOSEK, Doctor and others
Wakefield v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Darryl Wakefield
Defendant:
A. Schwarzenegger, M. Cate, K. Hurdle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eugene Hamilton v. J. Harris, et al
as 08-57071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE HAMILTON
Defendant:
J. A. HARRIS, Associate Warden, individual and official capacities, G. STANLEY, Education Principal, individual and official capacities, J. LEWIS, Educational Vice Principal, individual and official capacities and others
Hamilton v. Lara et al
as 1:2008cv01967
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hamilton
Defendant:
Lara, E. Cohen, Gurrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilton v. Mills
as 3:2008cv01231
Petitioner:
Daymien J. Tilton
Respondent:
Don Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beyett v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2008cv01367
Plaintiff:
Lynn Charles Beyett
Defendant:
V. O'Brien, D. Ragan, L. Doehring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yann v. Tilton et al
as 2:2008cv02152
Plaintiff:
Sokol Yann
Defendant:
J. Tilton, Davey and Morris
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
