Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ANTOINE et al v. BELLEVILLE MUNICIPAL COURT et al
as 2:2010cv01212
Plaintiff:
MAX DENIS ANTOINE, NELCHAEL S. ANTOINE, MAXINE B. ANTOINE and others
Defendant:
BELLEVILLE MUNICIPAL COURT, TOWNSHIP OF BELLEVILLE, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. COLE HAAN HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05958
Plaintiff:
COREY THOMAS
Defendant:
COLE HAAN HOLDINGS, INC., RAY BRODECHERE, NIKE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
HERN v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2009cv04650
Plaintiff:
MARLENE HERN
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JOHN DOE (1-12) and XYZ CORPORATION (1-12)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
