Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Lawson v. Motley
as 7:2010cv00009
Petitioner: James Darrell Lawson
Respondent: John Motley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Motley
as 3:2010cv00040
Plaintiff: Gary Davis and Gary Davis
Defendant: John Motley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Danny Chambers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-6483
Movant: In re: DANNY CHAMBERS
Respondent: JOHN MOTLEY, Warden, Warden
Bates v. Motley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00377
Petitioner: Alfred Bates
Respondent: John Motley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinkle v. Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00056
Plaintiff: Oliver Hinkle
Defendant: Department of Corrections, Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex, Ron Everson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slaven v. Motley
as 6:2009cv00260
Petitioner: Corbett Charles Slaven
Respondent: John Motley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Motley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv00044
Plaintiff: Vincent D. Adams
Defendant: John Motley, Rob Howerton, John Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Lashane Morris
as 09-5557
Movant: In re: LASHANE MORRIS
Respondent: JOHN MOTLEY
Goff v. Motley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2009cv00061
Petitioner: Danny Ray Goff
Respondent: John Motley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols v. Motley
as 3:2009cv00288
Petitioner: David Ronald Nichols
Respondent: John Motley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?