Cases 21 - 30 of 95
Parrish-Parrado v. Waddington et al
as 5:2014cv03178
Petitioner:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Respondent:
Doug Waddington, David Ferris, Larned Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parrish-Parrado (ID 25121) v. Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv03172
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Defendant:
B. Johnson and Larned Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish-Parrado (ID 25121) v. Green et al
as 5:2014cv03129
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Defendant:
Randall H. Green and Larned Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3139
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03077
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Parrish-Parrado v. Shield, et al
as 14-3053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL JOSEPH PARRISH-PARRADO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN SHIELD and LARNED CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Parrish-Parrado (ID 25121) v. Shield et al
as 5:2014cv03028
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Defendant:
John Shield and Larned Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish-Parrado v. Johnson, et al
as 14-3026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL JOSEPH PARRISH-PARRADO
Defendant - Appellee:
B. JOHNSON, Mailroom Clerk, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and LARNED CORRECTIONAL MENTAL HEALTH FACILITY
Parrish-Parrado (ID 25121) v. Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv03019
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Defendant:
B. Johnson and Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Larned Correctional, et al
as 13-3263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL JOSEPH PARRISH
Defendant - Appellee:
LARNED CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN DOE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
