Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Giuffre v. Maxwell
as 16-3945
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Virginia L. Giuffre
Respondent:
Sharon Churcher
Respondent - Appellee:
Jeffrey Epstein
Defendant:
Ghislaine Maxwell
Intervenor - Appellant:
Alan M. Dershowitz
Giuffre v. Maxwell
as 1:2015cv07433
Plaintiff:
Virginia L. Giuffre
Defendant:
Ghislaine Maxwell
Respondent:
Sharon Churcher and Jeffrey Epstein
Applicant:
John Stanley Pottinger
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
John Doe
Not Classified By Court:
Nadia Marcinko
Interested Party:
Sarah Vickers, NYP Holdings, Inc., and Daily News, L.P.
Material Witne:
Sarah Ransome
Intervenor:
Alan M. Dershowitz, Michael Cernovich d/b/a Cernovich Media, Julie Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jane Doe v. Roy Black
as 13-12923
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANE DOE
Intervenor - Appellant:
ROY BLACK, MARTIN G. WEINBERG and JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein
as 13-12926
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANE DOE
Intervenor - Appellant:
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
J. v. Epstein et al
as 9:2010cv81111
Plaintiff:
M. J.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. v. Epstein
as 1:2010cv21586
Plaintiff:
Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Epstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
C.L. v. Epstein
as 9:2010cv80447
Defendant:
Jeffrey Epstein
Plaintiff:
C. L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jane Doe No. 103 v. Epstein
as 9:2010cv80309
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE No. 103
Defendant:
Jeffrey Epstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Doe No 8 v. Epstein
as 9:2009cv80802
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe No 8 and Jane Doe No 8
Defendant:
Jeffrey Epstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Doe No. 102 v. Epstein
as 9:2009cv80656
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe No. 102
Defendant:
Jeffrey Epstein
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
