Cases 21 - 30 of 32
WILLIAMS v. WALSH
as 2:2011cv05574
Petitioner:
GILBERT R. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JEROME W. WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crawford v. Walsh et al
as 1:2011cv01251
Plaintiff:
Lee E. Crawford
Defendant:
Jerome W. Walsh, Nancy Fedor, Pall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUANE-BARTHOLOMEW v. WALSH et al
as 2:2011cv04189
Petitioner:
PETERS-EL DUANE-BARTHOLOMEW
Respondent:
JEROME W. WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LUZERNE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cannon v. Kopotoski et al
as 3:2011cv01046
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Cannon
Defendant:
Michael D. Kopotoski, Jerome W. Walsh, David Mosier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODALL v. WALSH et al
as 2:2011cv00607
Petitioner:
ERNEST WOODALL
Respondent:
JEROME W. WALSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Petrov v. Walsh et al
as 1:2011cv00357
Petitioner:
Boris M Petrov
Respondent:
Jerome W. Walsh and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. Beard et al
as 3:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Davon Hayes
Defendant:
Jerome W. Walsh, Lawrence P Mahally, Myron Stanishefski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Harrison et al
as 3:2010cv01878
Plaintiff:
Donnell Lavell Johnson
Defendant:
Lester Harrison, Jerome W Walsh and C. J. McKeown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. WALSH et al
as 3:2010cv01718
Petitioner:
Edwin Walker
Respondent:
Jerome W. Walsh , The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. WALSH et al
as 2:2010cv03789
Petitioner:
EDWIN WALKER
Respondent:
JEROME W. WALSH , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
