Cases 21 - 27 of 27
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Rivera-Hernandez et al
as 3:2008cv01192
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Luis A. Rivera-Hernandez, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Rivera-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Ventura-Candelaria et al
as 3:2008cv01190
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Zuleika Ventura-Candelaria, John Doe 1, Conjugal Partnership Doe-Ventura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Rodriguez-Rivero et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Police Department et al
as 3:2008cv01016
Plaintiff:
Harry Rodriguez-Rivero, Linette Miro-Quinones and rtnership Rodriguez-Miro
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Police Department, Pedro Toledo-Davila, Rafael Ramos-Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez-Perez v. Toledo-Davila et al
as 3:2007cv01757
Plaintiff:
Fernando Gonzalez-Perez and Fernando Gonzalez-Perez
Defendant:
Pedro Toledo-Davila, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Toledo-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos-Jimenez v. Commonwealth of P.R. et al
as 3:2007cv01737
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramos-Jimenez
Defendant:
Commonwealth of P.R., University of Puerto Rico, University Hospital of Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
M.N.H., Inc. v. Municipality of Ponce et al
as 3:2007cv01605
Plaintiff:
M.N.H., Inc.
Defendant:
Municipality of Ponce, Francisco Zayas-Seijo, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gutierrez-Faccini et al v. Ruiz-Ortiz et al
as 3:2007cv01345
Plaintiff:
Carla Jesus Gutierrez-Faccini and Andrea Sthefania Danjoy-Faccini
Defendant:
Juan J. Ruiz-Ortiz, Juan J. Ruiz-Ortiz, David Garcia-Falu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
