Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Ramirez v. John Doe
as 1:2017cv09103
Petitioner:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carderras v. Fernando's Pizzeria et al
as 7:2014cv05748
Plaintiff:
Cecilio Carderras
Defendant:
Fernando's Pizzeria and Jose Hernan Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ramirez v. Satmar Meat of Cong. Yetev Lev, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05975
Defendant:
Moshe Lavy Brown and Satmar Meat of Cong. Yetev Lev, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Zorrilla v. Metro Floral Decorators Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv04214
Defendant:
Adrian Benetiz Flores, Maritza Benetiz Flores, Yovani Benetiz Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Jaramillo Zorrilla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez v. Local One Security Officers Union
as 1:2010cv09612
Plaintiff:
Jose Apolinar Ramirez
Defendant:
Local One Security Officers Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. Sophie's Cuban Cuisine, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv06373
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Ramirez
Defendant:
Gomero Restaurant Enterprises LLC, Julio Caesar Gomero, Patricia Mahabir and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez Ramirez et al v. Sunrise Mart "John" King et al
as 1:2010cv04620
Plaintiff:
Marco Perez Ramirez , Jose Mayancela Palaguachi , Genaro Calixto Gutierrez and others
Defendant:
Sunrise Mart "John" King and Tony "Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv04138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
