Cases 21 - 30 of 937
Carr v. Keyes
as 2:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Paul D Carr
Defendant:
Eileen M Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magwood, Earl v. Keyes
as 3:2023cv00665
Petitioner:
Earl C. Magwood
Respondent:
FCI Warden Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Keyes
as 3:2023cv00667
Petitioner:
James King
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walker v. Keyes
as 5:2023cv03226
Petitioner:
Domonique V. Walker
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vernon Chapman v. R. Keyes
as 23-2762
Petitioner / Appellant:
VERNON CHAPMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
R. D. KEYES
Ashley, Tyshown v. Keyes, Warden
as 3:2023cv00646
Petitioner:
Tyshown R. Ashley
Respondent:
FCI Warden Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aram Movsisyan v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv07443
Plaintiff:
Aram Movsisyan
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Keyes European LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
KEYES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17358
Plaintiff:
MARIE KEYES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker, Domonique v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2023cv00645
Petitioner:
Domonique V. Walker
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DeBruhl v. Keyes et al
as 2:2023cv06324
Plaintiff:
Nanette DeBruhl
Defendant:
Julie Keyes, Keyes Art Consulting, LLC and Edward Ellington Jr. doing business as Ellington Entertainment Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
