Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Kennedy v. Foster
as 1:2019cv01281
Respondent:
Brian Foster
Petitioner:
Un'Quail Kennedy and Unquail T Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wolfgram-Kennedy v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00774
Plaintiff:
Denise Wolfgram-Kennedy
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill and Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Kennedy, Ellen v. Berryhill, Nancy
as 3:2018cv00421
Plaintiff:
Ellen Kennedy
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund v. Stoelting et al
as 2:2017cv01788
Defendant:
Ivor J. Evans, Scott D Rued, Chad M. Utrup and others
Plaintiff:
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ryan, John v. Gilchrist et al
as 3:2017cv00899
Plaintiff:
John Richard Ryan, Jr.
Defendant:
Gilchrist, Pogantsch, Hoag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01630
Plaintiff:
William J Kennedy
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kent v. Stoelting et al
as 2:2017cv00893
Plaintiff:
Jesse Kent
Defendant:
Scott D. Rued, Ivor J. Evans, Curtis Stoelting and others
Nominal Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. and Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund
Not Classified By Court:
Richard Flanagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LaFayette v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Kennedy LaFayette
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bowen v. Dallet et al
as 2:2016cv01677
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bowen
Defendant:
Rebecca F Dallet, Scott Walker, Wisconsin Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
