Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Wilson v. Astrue
as 1:2014cv00447
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Wilson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cosentino et al v. Transcend Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03627
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Zier-Teitler, Margaret E. Mackey, Denese Dugay and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wilson v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv07807
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Wilson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Wilson et al
as 1:2011cv07538
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Defendant:
Chandra A Wilson and Angelo L Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv12465
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Wilson
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Wilson et al
as 1:2009cv06560
Plaintiff:
Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Howard McDougal
Defendant:
Jennifer L Wilson and Deborah Scott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Central States Se & Sw Areas Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Wilson et al
as 1:2009cv04406
Plaintiff:
Central States Se & Sw Areas Health & Welfare Fund and Howard McDougall
Defendant:
Jennifer L Wilson and Deborah Scott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wilson v. McCoy et al
as 1:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Aaron L Wilson, Sr
Defendant:
Michael McCoy and Steve Settingsgaard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ahad v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2009cv02564
Plaintiff:
Sultan Abdul Ahad and Sultan Abdul Ahad
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, J. L. Wilson and D. L. Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Tompkins et al
as 3:2009cv00077
Plaintiff:
Paula L. Wilson
Defendant:
Steven Arthur Tompkins and CRST, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
