Cases 21 - 30 of 172
Smith v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv18462
Plaintiff:
LaMar Smith
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Ramos Vela, Casey Celum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Felipe Gonzalez, Jr., Ramos Vela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LAMAR SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, APD Officer A. Morell, APD Officer Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Melody Maddox, A. Morell, Andrea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv04807
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Ted Jackson, Officer Jones, Officer Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Morell et al
as 1:2022cv04241
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Officer Mrs. A. Morell, Officer Mrs. Murray, Officer Andrea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15099
Plaintiff:
LAMAR SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11832
Plaintiff:
RICKIE LAMAR SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
