Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Richard Chudacoff v. University Medical Center, et al
as 09-17558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CHUDACOFF, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, RORY REID, KATHLEEN SILVER and others
Tate, Jr., M.D. v. University Medical Center Of Southern Nevada et al
as 2:2009cv01748
Plaintiff:
James S. Tate, Jr., M.D. and James S. Tate, Jr., M.D.
Defendant:
University Medical Center Of Southern Nevada, Steve Sisolak, Tom Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chudacoff, MD v. University Medical Center Of Southern Nevada et al
as 2:2009cv01679
Plaintiff:
Richard Chudacoff, MD and Richard Chudacoff, MD
Defendant:
University Medical Center Of Southern Nevada, Steve Sisolak, Tom Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James Tate, Jr. v. University Medical Center of S, et al
as 09-16505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES S. TATE, Jr., M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA, KATHLEEN SILVER, BRUCE L. WOODBURY and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF LEGAL MEDICINE
Williams v. University Medical Center Of Southern Nevada et al.,
as 2:2009cv00554
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, M.D.
Defendant:
University Medical Center Of Southern Nevada, John Ellerton, M.D., Rory Reid and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tate v. University Medical Center Of Southern Nevada et al
as 2:2008cv01183
Plaintiff:
James S Tate, Jr. and James S Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
University Medical Center Of Southern Nevada, Kathleen Silver, Bruce L. Woodbury and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Southwest Advertising, Inc., et al v. County of Clark et al
as 2:2007cv01724
Plaintiff:
Southwest Advertising, Inc., Richard Soranno, Wild West Advertising, Inc. and others
Defendant:
County of Clark, Denis Cederburg, Rory Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
