Cases 21 - 30 of 985
Butler v. Waters et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Robey Lee Butler
Defendant:
Kyle E. Waters, Matthew Orendorff and Stacey Slaughter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxey v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Maxey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bumphus v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Tammie Lee Bumphus
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Brion Lee Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Price v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv01064
Petitioner:
Lee Earnest Price, III
Respondent:
Kris Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Breazeale v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Breazeale
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hunter v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv01096
Petitioner:
Henry Lee Hunter
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jewell v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Lee Jewell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
