Cases 21 - 30 of 39
DANTZLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv02142
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MACHIE v. GREEN et al
as 1:2015cv01815
Plaintiff:
EDMOND K. MACHIE
Defendant:
LEO E. GREEN, JR, LORI HESTER, ERIC ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GROSS v. WRIGHT
as 1:2015cv01166
Plaintiff:
JAY GROSS , 11TH PROPERTY GROUP LLC , 1524 OGDEN STREET NW LLC and others
Defendant:
STEPHEN C. WRIGHT , THOMAS M. WOODRUFF , CENTRAL PROPERTIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
BISHOP v. BONNER
as 1:2015cv00485
Plaintiff:
J. BISHOP
Defendant:
LEO BONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CANNADY v. STATE OF MISSOURI et al
as 1:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
VINCENT CANNADY
Defendant:
STATE OF MISSOURI, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI BOARD OF CURATORS, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RELVAS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2014cv01752
Plaintiff:
JOHN RELVAS , ESTATE OF RUI RELVAS , ESTATE OF JOAO RELVAS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
STATE OF FLORIDA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01428
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Movant:
KENNETH SULLIVAN , ALBERT LEO SULLIVAN , MICHAEL BERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
DAIGLE v. CAPELLO
as 1:2010cv01265
Petitioner:
RALPH LEO DAIGLE
Respondent:
GARY J. CAPELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAIGLE v. GRIBLER
as 1:2010cv01266
Petitioner:
RALPH LEO DAIGLE
Respondent:
DALE R. GRIBLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAIGLE v. KARNES
as 1:2010cv01264
Petitioner:
RALPH LEO DAIGLE
Respondent:
JAMES A. KARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
