Cases 21 - 30 of 83
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02160
Plaintiff:
JUAN ALBERTO ORTIZ-LOPEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JORGE LUIS SOLAR-CHIMA and others
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CISNEROS v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2016cv02095
Plaintiff:
JUAN GABRIEL CISNEROS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ANDREW S. HANEN, CHARLES E. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2016cv02055
Plaintiff:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS, FEDERAL JUDICIAL COMMISSION, DANE R. GILLETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv02026
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAMING v. LYNCH
as 1:2016mc02066
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01997
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF ALABAMA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ODEMNS v. GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01923
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LEE ODEMNS, III
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, LORETTA E. LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNN v. LYNCH
as 1:2016cv01881
Plaintiff:
IKE SHAWNDALE NUNN
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
