Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Dale et al v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2015cv04103
Plaintiff:
James Irving Dale, Brian Michael Holzer, Michael Eugene Koch and others
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Joshua Klimek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. The Travelers Indemnity Company et al
as 4:2014cv04145
Plaintiff:
Lori Peterson
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company, The Phoenix Insurance Company, The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siers v. Gilbertson et al
as 4:2014cv04035
Plaintiff:
Donovan Siers
Defendant:
David E. Gilbertson, John K. Konenkamp, Glen A. Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuiken et al v. Davis et al
as 4:2013cv04085
Plaintiff:
Arlin Kuiken and Brent Kuiken
Defendant:
Lori Davis and Randy Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Seeking Land v. USA
as 3:2013cv03024
Petitioner:
Lorie Seeking Land
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
King v. Kesse et al
as 4:2012cv04120
Plaintiff:
Roger B. King
Defendant:
Jess Kesse, Paul Schueth, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Wilbur
as 3:2012cv03020
Petitioner:
Kim Wade Dillon
Respondent:
Lori S. Wilbur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dalrymple et al v. Dooley et al
as 4:2012cv04098
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Dalrymple and Leslie W. White, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Jennifer Stanwick, Sue Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crow Eagle v. United States Marshal's Service et al
as 4:2012cv04069
Plaintiff:
Gilbert D. Crow Eagle
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Paul Schorder, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crow Eagle v. United States Marshal's Service et al
as 3:2012cv03012
Plaintiff:
Gilbert O. Crow Eagle
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Paul Schorder, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
