Cases 21 - 30 of 110
MADDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05015
Plaintiff:
TROY MADDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MADDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04328
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MADDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MADDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54145
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN B MADDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46123
Plaintiff:
JASON ROLAND MADDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER MADDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43997
Plaintiff:
DONALD E MADDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LaMartina v. City of Mandeville, Louisiana et al
as 8:2021cv01027
Defendant:
Gerald Sticker, David Parnell, Blue Williams, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elise LaMartina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HETHERINGTON v. LEE
as 3:2021cv00671
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, KYMBERLEE CURRY SMITH, JONI ALEXIS POITIER and others
Plaintiff:
KELLS HETHERINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. The City of Lakeland et al
as 8:2021cv00235
Defendant:
William Mutz, Matthew Vaughn, Bill and others
Plaintiff:
Howard A. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv24899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
