Cases 21 - 28 of 28
LLOYD et al v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2011cv01386
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. LLOYD and PAUL STONE
Defendant:
DAVID F. CARNEY, SHAUN E. MCALMONT, SCOTT M. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREED et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2010cv06440
Plaintiff:
EVAN FREED and MARCIE FREED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ARMY, JOHN MCHUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MCHUGH v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02724
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MCHUGH
Defendant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, INC. , MAYTAG CORPORATION , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
D'ONOFRIO v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK et al
as 3:2009cv06220
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN D'ONOFRIO
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE PARK, ROBERT W. MATTHIES, THOMAS E. CONNORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 3:2009cv05889
Plaintiff:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK, THE DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER, DELAWARE NATURE SOCIETY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN MCHUGH, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. NATALE et al
as 2:2009cv01961
Plaintiff:
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
ANTHONY F. NATALE, WILLIAM GOTTSCHALL, KATHLEEN GOTTSCHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
FISH et al v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY et al
as 3:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. FISH, RICHARD J. GAUDY, ANGELO M. AGUILERA and others
Defendant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN and KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
