Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Rotondo v. Koehn et al
as 3:2017cv00395
Defendant:
Michael Koehn, Keli Lyons, Mark Mabson and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rotondo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Hosmer v. Adam Laxalt, et al
as 17-15660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY HOSMER
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM PAUL LAXALT, JAMES COX, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Salas v. Koehn et al
as 3:2016cv00635
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas and Dr. Michael Koehn
Plaintiff:
Jerry Salas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Davis et al
as 2:2016cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jose Trinidad Flores
Defendant:
Greg Davis, Michael Koehn, Pamela Hurring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Aranas et al
as 3:2016cv00606
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Renee Baker, Gloria Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Inginio Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Director Cox et al
as 2:2016cv02433
Defendant:
Michael Byrne, Gloria Carpenter, Director Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Tashaun S. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Aranas et al
as 3:2016cv00394
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Renee Baker, G. Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womack v. Aranas et al
as 3:2016cv00287
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Renee Baker, Harold Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Jaramie Dean Womack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv00755
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Koehn, Nevada Department of Corrections, State of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00067
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Jayson Artinger, Renee Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
