Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Woodson v. Jenkins
as 3:2013cv00492
Plaintiff:
Moses Woodson
Defendant:
Micheal Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Exelis Inc. et al v. KeyW Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00839
Plaintiff:
Exelis Inc. and EVI Technology, LLC
Defendant:
KeyW Corp. , Herschel L. Johnson , John F. Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Moses v. USA
as 2:2012cv01522
Plaintiff:
Samuel Q. Moses
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Moses v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2012cv00630
Plaintiff:
Donna Moses
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moses v. USA
as 2:2012cv00214
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Samuel Q. Moses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harold v. Leffler & Mosley, P.C. Defined Benefit Pension Plan et al
as 1:2012cv00389
Plaintiff:
Brendan D. Harold
Defendant:
Leffler & Mosley, P.C. Defined Benefit Pension Plan, Plan Administrator Of Leffler & Mosley, P.C. Defined Benefit Pension Plan, Plan Sponsor, Leffler & Mosely, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Woodard v. Fredericksburg Hospitalist Group, P.C. et al
as 1:2012cv00261
Plaintiff:
Emily Woodard
Defendant:
Fredericksburg Hospitalist Group, P.C., Fredericksburg Hospitalist Group, P.C. Profit Sharing Plan, Imran Ahmad and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Canady v. USA
as 4:2012cv00040
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Moses Devon Canady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Akbar v. Quinones et al
as 7:2012cv00001
Defendant:
Cathy Riley, Mark Shiflett, Dr. Moses Quinones and others
Plaintiff:
Takeem B. Akbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martins v. Akers et al
as 7:2011cv00252
Defendant:
Betty Akers, Mark Amonette, Dr. John Marsh and others
Plaintiff:
Oluyomi Martins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
